AI Political Compass

Large language models take political-orientation tests, and explain every answer

What it took to create this project

One last bit of trivia, for anyone curious what producing a project like this takes. Everything here — the data collection, the experiments above, and the site itself — was built in conversation with Claude Code (Fable 5), an AI coding agent: a human typing instructions and reviewing the results, the agent writing the code, running the collections and keeping the books. The numbers below, measured from the agent's session logs by ccstats, are what those conversations added up to.

62 hof active work, over18active days
574prompts typed by the human
68,071words typed395,530characters typed
23.0 Mtokens of model input + output1.59 Bincluding cache
389 Ktokens of input22.7 Mtokens of output
613subagent launches15,821tool invocations
3,175web pages fetched2,178web searches
$3,023what the tokens would cost at API rates

The cost figure is hypothetical: it prices the tokens at the vendors' pay-as-you-go API rates. The project actually ran on a fixed-price Claude Max 20x subscription, so that is what the work would have cost via the API, not what was paid. The headline token count excludes prompt-cache reads — context re-served to the model, which dwarfs everything else without representing new work; the "including cache" figure counts them. Subagent launches are the agent delegating subtasks to fresh copies of itself — all of the Section 14 research ran this way: a fresh copy knows only what its own instructions tell it, which is what made running those agents blind possible.

Best on a bigger screen

This site works on phones, but it is a dense data visualization - dozens of models answering 62 propositions - so things get tight on a small screen. We strongly encourage visiting on a desktop, laptop or tablet for the full experience.

Add yourself to the plot

Take the politicalcompass.org test and enter your scores below. Your dot stays until you reload the page.